It was standing room only as family farmers from around North America filled Federal Court Judge Naomi Buchwald’s courtroom in Manhattan on Tuesday, January 31.  The topic was the landmark organic community lawsuit OSGATA et al v. Monsanto and the oral argument in Monsanto’s pre-trial motion to dismiss which it filed last July. Over fifty-five Plaintiffs were in the courtroom from at least 21 States and Provinces including Oregon, California, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, Saskatchewan, Missouri, Iowa, Ohio, Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont and Maine.

     Meanwhile, outside the courthouse in Foley Square, hundreds turned out for the Citizens’ Assembly of support for family farmers, an action organized by several groups including Occupy Food Justice.  A depiction of Monsanto’s infamous 100 year history including Agent Orange, Dioxin, PCBs and now gene-spliced food was presented. Speakers addressed  topics ranging from sustainable agriculture to risks associated with GMOs to issues of good food and food justice. After the conclusion of the of the courtroom oral argument, the plaintiff farmers and their legal team from the Public Patent Foundation provided details and comments on the courtroom proceedings to supporters at the Citizens' Assembly.

     "We were very pleased that the court granted our request to have oral argument regarding Monsanto's motion to dismiss our case today,” said Daniel Ravicher
of the Public Patent Foundation, lead lawyer for the Plaintiffs.  “The judge graciously permitted both parties to raise all the points they wished in a session that lasted over an hour.  While Monsanto's attorney attempted to portray the risk organic farmers face from being contaminated and then accused of patent infringement as hypothetical and abstract, we rebutted those arguments with the concrete proof of the harm being suffered by our clients in their attempts to avoid such accusations.  The judge indicated she will issue her ruling within two months.  We expect she will deny the motion and the case will then proceed forward.  If she should happen to grant the motion, we will most likely appeal to the Court of Appeals who will review her decision without deference."
 
     The large group of 83 Plaintiffs in OSGATA v. Monsanto is comprised of individual family farmers, independent seed companies and agricultural organizations. The total number of members within the plaintiff group exceeds 300,000 and includes many thousands of certified organic farmers.  The Plaintiffs are not seeking any monetary compensation.  Instead, the farmers are pre-emptively suing Monsanto under the Declaratory Judgment Act and seeking court protection from Monsanto-initiated patent infringement lawsuits.

     President of lead Plaintiff, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, Maine organic seed farmer Jim Gerritsen was in the courtroom and witnessed the oral argument. Gerritsen had this to say, “Our lawyer did a good job explaining the current injustice farmers face. We have a right to be secure on our farms and to be free from Monsanto’s GMO trespass. If we become contaminated by Monsanto, not only is the value of our organic seed crop extinguished but we could also be sued by Monsanto for patent infringement because their contamination results in our ‘possession’ of their GMO technology. We have farmers who have stopped growing organic corn, organic canola and organic soybeans because they can’t risk being sued by Monsanto. It’s not fair and it’s not right. Family farmers need justice and we deserve the protection of the court.”

      Early on in the legal process, Monsanto was asked by lawyers for the Plaintiffs to provide a binding legal covenant not to sue. Monsanto refused this request and in doing so made clear that it would not give up its option to sue contaminated innocent family farmers who want nothing to do with Monsanto’s GMO technology.
 
     In a remarkable demonstration of solid support by American citizens for family farmers, co-plaintiff Food Democracy Now! has collected over 100,000 signatures on its petition supporting the rights of family farmers against Monsanto. “For the past 12,000 years farmers have saved the best seeds each year to increase yields and improve traits for the food we eat,” said Dave Murphy, founder and Executive Director of Food Democracy Now! “In 1996, when Monsanto sold its first patented genetically modified (GMO) seed to farmers, this radically changed the idea of how farmers planted and saved seed. Less than two decades later, Monsanto's aggressive patent infringement lawsuits have created a climate of fear in rural America among farmers. It's time for that to end. Farmers should not have to live in fear because they are growing our food."
   

     A complete 36 page transcript of the oral argument is available here (pdf | txt).
     Further information on OSGATA v. Monsanto is available from woodprairiefarm.com.