Did Monsanto – cloaked from public view – funnel funds into the legal defense of GE farmer Michael Baxter? It was Mr. Baxter who grew the GE Canola crop in 2010 which contaminated Steve Marsh’s organic farm, causing Steve to lose his organic certification. In an important new Court development, the AUSTRALIAN SUPREME COURT HAS ORDERED Mr. Baxter to DISCLOSE financial help he has received. “Mr Marsh sought compensation after he lost organic certification over 70 per cent of his farm when GM canola swathes and seeds from Mr Baxter’s property blew onto his land in 2010. In court on Wednesday, Mr Marsh appealed the costs decision and sought to find out if Mr Baxter had received any gifts or donations to pay his legal costs, making reference to the PGA and agricultural biotechnology company Monsanto…Under the indemnity principle, Mr Marsh did not have to pay any more in court costs than Mr Baxter himself paid his lawyers…Asked if there were payments from Monsanto, he said: ‘Well, I can’t tell you that because that is confidential’…Mr Marsh’s legal team this week also delivered an appeal to the court on the dismissal of his compensation case.” In a situation which closely mirrors that of ‘OSGATA et al v. Monsanto,’ the Steve Marsh compensation lawsuit was handled by a hostile judge who had made up his mind against the organic farmer early on. Jim
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-03-25/gm-appeal-sees-farmer-ordered-to-reveal-financial-help/6347468